The Motor Car is Killing Us
Although electricity is generated from fossil fuels without doubt an important factor in air pollution, there is only a poor second behind motor vehicle exhaust. In the United States was established that the CO2 emissions from cars and trucks, 314 million tonnes in 2002. (Emissions continue to rise steadily in the 5 years prior to the publication of this book).
Looking at a fairly typical example of the ratio of emissions from motor vehicles, the emissions of coal-generated electricity inPower plants in 1996, Travis County in the U.S., produces 1,700 tons of NOx per year, while motor vehicles contributed 30,000 tonnes.
It seems as though our love of cars is the most important factor in the potential demise of the human race. Wherever you go in the industrialized world, the congestion on the roads and highways is rising alarmingly. When several thousand meters, motor vehicles and road systems considered in our great cities resemble ant nests incredibly busy as we allto bustle up and down each other's paths in a mad search from place to place.
Zero Emission Vehicles
Technologies for zero emission vehicles for many years, but has enormous power, the car manufacturers and seen to exercise their undeniable connection with oil companies, many of these inventions effectively broken. Their ability to compete against giant corporations will no doubt be frustrated to the point when a significantImprovements in the capacity of batteries and robustness of hydrogen fuel cells (HFCs) and the conventional car manufacturer decides that enough market for HFC-cars, electric cars and hybrid designs that promise to go a long way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Meanwhile, the United States to coincide with vehicle emissions standards are far below those of China and Europe, has something of a global pariah, the failure to embrace both cleanerMotor vehicles and ratification of the Kyoto agreement. The rebellion has caused considerable anger in the world, especially in developing countries, although not such a big contribution to solving environmental problems of the planet, but one hundred per cent suffer from the effects of climate change.
The car is killing us!
It is now time for us to reconsider the extent to which we rely on motor vehicles. How many of us travel to a central place of employmentjust sitting at a computer screen for much of the day, when maybe we could perform the same function at home? Granted, not everyone is sitting behind a computer screen, but must take into account the employer more to provide the employment of people from residential communities by bicycle or on foot. With video-conferencing and other technologies, it seems many companies no sense to pay expensive rents for office space and the expensive infrastructure associated with a high riseBuildings.
Urban planners have ways of establishing communities to investigate the fully on the needs of its residents in terms of employment, medical care, shopping, entertainment and education. In addition, all of us have the staff to rethink our goals and objectives play in defining our careers to "green" thinking in our work habits.
We can no longer afford to use the sprawling dormitory towns with outlying suburbs, where people are forced to, motorVehicles, because the public transport system is ineffective, inconvenient or services are irregular, or too uncomfortable. All over the world, the streets clogged with vehicles, each of which only one person, the answer to public transport more attractive and make the family car unattractive or too expensive. We need to educate the people to think twice before they opened fire on a ton of inefficient, polluting machines.
A complete shift in collective thinking aboutthe actual cost of the cars is essential to our survival. This could be done by introducing a carbon tax on petrol and diesel, will be burned with the money from each liter to increase the carbon reduction strategies such as planting trees. Attractive discounts to motorists Government relating to alternative vehicle technologies that would kick start the necessary changes in the automotive history of thinking of the public.
Instead of status symbols must be changed public perception, so that wea social conscience for the use of motor vehicles, as we are now on the recycling of household waste. Australians in the most drought-affected states will change with the almost overnight in the public perception of the water to be familiar. When the dams were running low, and they could no longer thirsty, water garden sprinklers and long showers, most of them quite well together, so why should not change the perception about the use of polluting vehicles?
Is this all piein the sky?
If you believe the above proposals are unlikely and will not happen for a moment to reflect on cigarette smoking. Who would be in Australia or New Zealand now dream of light in a restaurant, a shopping center or office building? Smoking in the presence of non-smokers will now act as an offensive and clean breach the rights of others, not to breathe polluted air was adopted. Concerted campaigns and other strategies for public education can work and veryeffective.
The benefits of moving from a hedonistic greedy, wasteful is a consumer society is by far the disadvantages. We could enter into communication and empathy with each other much better. A slower pace of life, as we stop this insane quest for more "stuff" is to a significant decline in mental and physical health. As we slow down the implementation of the precious gift we have in this beautiful planet we all share given, then we would be more and more spiritual,better appreciate the sanctity of nature and our children. It is certainly worth considering, is not it?
Recommend : skypream gooddigg Languages Leadership